After #DRUGSCIENCE2017-Conference

Research, practice and global change in 21st Century research about psychoactive substances

Campus Charité Mitte | September 7 – 9, 2017

We are grateful for your responsible, critical and inspiring discussions. MIND Foundation has cllwith FINDER and the Psychotropic Substances Research Group at the Charité Universitätsmedizin  in organizing the track Psychedelic Medicine. Thank you for the cooperation. Since we think that researching psychedelic states should not be considered in isolation placing it within the family of other drug science disciplines seems essential to us. FINDER is working on producing the videos of talks about the six tracks addiction medicine, prevention, internet and drugs, drug policy research, neuroscience and psychedelic science. This will take several weeks to months. Click here for the 2017 program!

Prof. Franz Vollenweider | Prof. Thomas Metzinger | Prof. David Nichols | Dr. med. Peter Gasser and many more

Sign up now for updates!

MIND promotes the scientific exploration of altered states of consciousness. Many of such states qualify to be called psychedelic. The word “psychedelic” means “manifesting the mind” – no matter whether this be induced by means of psychoactive substances or other methods that alter everyday consciousness. We work for safe and legal contexts to allow for the mindful handling of such states – so that therapeutic and transformative effects may come into fruition.

We bring together researchers from the natural and social sciences as well as from cultural studies for writing grants, discussing results and creating reliable knowledge. MIND networking partner for researchers, sponsors and supporters. Moreover, we enable adequate prevention of complications in the dealing with these states, as well as appropriate treatment.

Establishing the psychedelic experience as a tool for personal and societal development.

I support Psychedelic Science … because this research helps to relieve suffering, facilitates the development of new therapies and allows for precious explorations into the fabric of life.

Dr. Henrik Jungaberle
Dr. Henrik JungaberleFounder and Head of the MIND Boardmanually,http://

I Support MIND, because … societal change can only develop by contextualization, examination and scrutinizing of social norms.

Vera Sloof, M.A. Social Sciences
Vera Sloof, M.A. Social SciencesFounding Member

I support MIND, because … it is high time to question boundaries that block a new handling of maladies. Adequate and cutting-edge reserach is needed with approved scientific methods.

Dr. med. K.-J. Theine, Psychiater and Psychotherapist
Dr. med. K.-J. Theine, Psychiater and PsychotherapistFounding Member

I support MIND, because … I think, that time is ripe for a new handling of altered states of consciousness and psychoactive substances: based on research and common sense – not on taboos, anxiety and horror stories.

Dr. med. Andrea Zeuch
Dr. med. Andrea ZeuchFounding Member and MIND board member

I support MIND, because … researchers and therapists should be able to explore new forms of therapy – without being stigmatized.

Torsten Rüter, Entrepreneur
Torsten Rüter, EntrepreneurFounding Member

I support Psychedelic Science, because … it will contribute to better understanding psychedelic experience and utilizing its potential sustainably for individuals and society

Helena Aicher, Student
Helena Aicher, StudentFounding Member and MIND board member

I support Psychedelic Science, because … I think that psychedelics carry a huge potential that has not been explored sufficiently in the past. Human beings should walk paths that make this world a better place.

Peter Jarek
Peter Jarek

I think that Psychedelic Science is important, because … numerous people – entire cultures – may be existentially supported. Serious research into the ontology, functioning and capacity of our consicousness is of relevance to every human being

Marvin Agonda, Student
Marvin Agonda, StudentFounding Member

I support MIND, because we need to institutionalize a well-informed educational, ethical, political, medical, spiritual, and scientific ‹culture of consciousness› (‹Bewusstseinskultur› acc. to T. Metzinger); a progressive culture that sufficiently differentiates the subtle plurality of harmful, and desirable states of consciousness beyond questionable classifications of pharmacological as ‹bad›, and non-pharmacological as non-harmful technologies of consciousness. The crucial question is: What is a ‹good› state of consciousness, and which states (independent of the methods of induction) are we willing to integrate into our culture?

I support Psychedelic science, because the conceptual, and empirical study of etiology-independent disruptions of subpersonal processes underlying the phenomenal self (i.e. ego dissolution) fosters our phenomenological, psychological, and ontological knowledge and understanding of (self-)consciousness, its capacities, its pathologies, and its subjectivity. Sound Psychedelic science should be informed by Philosophy of mind, and Cognitive sciences – and vice versa. My fundamental question is: What is the epistemological value of psychedelic ego dissolution or rather mine-ness loss for understanding selfhood and the subjectivity of consciousness?

Cyril Costines, cand. M.Sc. Philosophy-Neuroscience-CognitionFounding Member